| Practices |
 |
|
|  |
 |
Markets |
 |
 |
Healthcare: |
 |

|
 |

|
 |

|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Services |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|

Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Ontology
Many U.S. healthcare insurers and providers lose millions of dollars
annually to fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA). An estimated four to ten
percent of all health insurance claims contain fraud, waste, or
abuse. CTG’s unique ontology-based approach to detecting FWA can
dramatically improve FWA identification, significantly lower FWA
losses, and minimize the impact of FWA on payer and provider bottom
lines.
We employ a new generation of business intelligence software
with an advanced targeting methodology that builds a comprehensive multisource knowledge base that identifies FWA patterns for
investigation. Our FWA team brings together experienced experts in
FWA detection from the public and private sectors, hospital
clinicians and administrators, and technologists with significant
healthcare and insurance industry knowledge. CTG’s FWA solution
efficiently identifies FWA at rates that materially exceed those of
standard brute force data mining approaches currently used by those
in the healthcare and insurance industries.
CTG's Approach
- Applies advanced business intelligence to model and target
FWA
- Uses ontology-based model to build a comprehensive FWA
knowledge base integrating provider and payer claim codes,
medical expertise, and provider data to flag FWA and recommend
actions
- Implements advanced rules-based FWA targeting
Client Benefits
- Provides a flexible, scalable system for
new forms of FWA
- Facilitates evidence collection and case building
- Facilitates revenue recovery and case tracking
- Provides advanced health insurance knowledge base
interfaces to existing systems
- Achieves higher recovery rates than standard methods
Identifying Fraud, Waste, and
Abuse
|
Examples of
Fraud, Waste, and Abuse |
Traditional Approach |
CTG's
Approach |
|
False
claims |
Data
mining/random audits |
Flags
duplicate claims in several categories |
|
Unnecessary
tests/supplies |
Data
mining/random audits |
Links to
diagnosis and clinical standards as overutilization check
|
|
Improper
codes |
Data
mining/random audits |
Targets/matches codes for upcoding patient
complexities/false treatment |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Copyright CTG, 2010. All rights reserved.
|